Thread:Romanoff Blitzer/@comment-35975550-20190110150328/@comment-893743-20190121090912

It may look like that I ignored this post, but I've actually been thinking about this post every day. I mentally went back and forth on this for over a week, going between my natural wiki conservatism and my desire for wiki improvement. On one hand, it's easier to keep things the way they are, since the current system is adequate and it takes effort to change things. However, I had a realization today. I remembered the Vanguard wiki and how annoyed I am that they don't even have pages for basic game mechanics. I decided that the purpose of a wiki is to record as information as possible.

So, here's what I suggest: go nuts. Make pages for every name category. All of the name categories you mentioned in 1-4, make pages and templates for all of them. But I'd suggest that you avoid the term "archetype." The term comes from Yu-Gi-Oh! and I don't think it ever made much sense anyways; it certainly doesn't mesh with the dictionary definition of the word "archetype." I'd go with something that makes more sense, like "name category" or "series" or "subset."