Talk:§Otagame§, Great Phantom Insect/@comment-24506549-20160927161634/@comment-25090143-20160930082803

Yuzuki SIGNI is good enough so in a sense, any LRIG that has decent effects can win you the game.

No, I do not find myself having ego issue even though I see myself being one of them. Mostly it's because my stand point is strong / feels factual enough while you in the other hand are not putting up a good reasoning on the conversation itself and always dodging my questions that will make me see your point.

Here's an example, you didn't even answer anything about how Vermillion has a "chance" if able to stall out against Piruluk while being resource damage cut every turn. You bring this point up in the air without even explaining it at all so how will I back down from my stand point? Because I don't see that happening.

That being said, this happens every single of our arguments. That's why I'm triggering.

Another example that just happen: Herakabuto topic. Did you even read my comments? I said that Herakabuto "is" being staple because there's "only" her back then. That doesn't change the fact that her design is mediocre and can be easily replace with any further support. And again, if you use this logic, then Partheno is suppose to be a good card just becasue back then she was run at 4?